Nokian Nordman and Nokian Hakkapeliitta: which is better and what are the differences? Nordman tires What else you need to know about Nokian Nordman and Nokian Hakkapeliitta

Winter studded Nokian tires Tires Nordman 7 are designed for drivers a wide range cars. The Nordman 7 is the second life of the well-established Tire Hakkapeliitta 7 for regions with difficult climatic conditions. Tires Nokian Tires Nordman 7 combine modern technological solutions aimed at achieving a high level of safety at winter roads and affordable price.

The model has a stud with a diamond-shaped carbide insert, which has improved traction in the longitudinal and transverse directions. The advanced AirShockAbsorber system is a spring cushion under the stud that reduces noise, prevents studs from falling out and improves stud durability.

Air Claw technology is air holes in the tread block that soften the impact of the stud on the road. This reduces vibration from the contact of the stud with the road. Among other things, this technology has reduced road wear and tire noise, as well as improved stud wear resistance.

Known as Bear Claw technology, already proven in Nokian Tires Hakkapeliitta tires, works to keep the studs upright while optimally supporting the tread blocks when braking. This provides Nokian Tires Nordman 7 with improved acceleration and braking performance on ice.

A large number of self-locking 3D lamellas work as additional gripping edges, remove residual moisture from the road surface and block tread blocks in emergency situations. Thanks to this, Finnish engineers managed to achieve confident handling, good traction and short braking distances.

In regions where winters are cold and frosty, motorists are more careful in choosing winter tires, and try to purchase proven tires from well-known manufacturers. Nokian has long been famous for its winter tires, which are most often adapted to harsh operating conditions. From budget segment the company has Nokian Nordman 7 - it is she who will be discussed below.

The Nokian concern was founded in 1898. Almost immediately after that, the Hakapelita and Nordman models appeared in the assortment. Due to the huge popularity, these tires did not stop producing for many years, and then they decided to upgrade.

As a result, this led to the fact that today they are presented in the 7th generation, and the demand for them does not decrease.

general information

Nokian Nordman 7 - rubber designed to ensure safety and comfort in difficult winter conditions. During the development, the same technologies were used as in the production of Hakapelita 7. However, the cost of Nordman 7 is much lower.

spikes

For improved grip with the road, the manufacturer decided to introduce spikes into the tread pattern. They have an unusual shape and are designed using the Bear Claw technology. Its essence is that the spike catches on the road surface during movement, and also does not change its position, it always remains vertical.

Also, in order to reduce noise during movement, special treads were additionally introduced into the pattern. air cushions around each spike. Such changes made it possible to improve not only grip, but also the efficiency of acceleration and braking, which is very important for winter roads.

The composition of the rubber compound

In order for the tires to be used in cold weather, it was necessary to change their rubber composition. Most often, silica is added for this, but cryosilane was introduced into Nordman 7. Thanks to him, tires do not harden in the cold.

It serves as a glue, connecting all other elements and improving their effectiveness. In sum, such changes improve not one indicator, but several at once.

Due to this, the rubber has become more durable, so the risk of cuts or hernias is significantly reduced. They also became elastic in any conditions, which is why comfort is achieved.

Among other things, the amount of emissions into the atmosphere is significantly reduced. Due to the changed composition of the rubber, it was possible, albeit slightly, to reduce fuel consumption.

Lamelization

The tread pattern allows you to improve all performance. Despite the fact that it has spikes, sipes were added to each block to improve traction. They have a non-standard shape - three-dimensional and with various cutouts. Thanks to them, the grip becomes much better.

Also on the tread there are grooves that form drainage system. Thanks to them, when driving on a wet surface, no deterioration in properties is observed, which has been verified by many studies.

Nordman 5 or Nordman 7: which is better?

This question is asked by many motorists, because at first glance, these two models do not have so many differences, but the cost is significantly different. Therefore, it is worth discussing based on financial capabilities.

If funds allow you to purchase Nokian Nordman 7, then it is better to give preference to them, since this is an improved, newer generation, and innovative technologies. Nordman 5 is also a good option, but technical and performance characteristics they are a little worse.

If you live in a region where winters are snowy and characterized by severe frosts, then Nokian Nordman 7 will be indispensable for equipping your car.

I live in the suburbs of Poltava, a 2002 Opel Astra car, on spacers + 2cm, I bought a Nordman 7 spike this fall. Over the past weekend, more than 30 cm of snow piled up, despite the fact that there was already snow. Roads on non-central streets were not cleaned for 3-4 days, those who had a neighbor with a cornfield or UAZ were lucky, I had to break through with an Opel.
What I liked about the tire, at low gas it perfectly compacts the snow, the car crushes the snow under it and goes clearly above the snow without touching it with the bottom. It goes on until you add extra gas or start digging stupidly. As soon as the wheel slipped, the car tears off the snow under it and sits on its belly, then only a shovel helps. Even on fresh snow without a rut, it goes better than on a deep rut, when the body partially clings to the downed snow. In a deep rut, the car just wants to leave the trodden rut and jump into a loose deep snow. As a result, I walked 200 meters of an uncleaned street on an Opel, sat down once because I started digging and was too lazy to turn it back. I dug it out with a shovel, handed it back and began to lay a track on a new one. The rubber output is excellent, on a higher machine there will be better cross-country ability, but it has what we have.
On ice, it clings sanely, obviously better than the previous Michelin Velcro. On rolled solid snow it rides perfectly, no worse than on asphalt.
I am satisfied with the tire, I recommend.

quick recall

Automatically generated feedback, based on the data from the form.

Rating of the winter tire Nokian Nordman 7 on different surfaces (from 1 to 5 points):
snow: 5
ice: 4
snow porridge: 3
dry asphalt: 4
wet asphalt: 3
comfort level (tire noise, ride): 4

It is not correct to compare the Nokian Nordman 7 with the Hakkapelite 7, despite the similar tread pattern and spikes. On the seventh Hakkapelite, I covered a little more than 100,000 km. I won’t say about Nordman 7, but it’s not noisy, it’s great on dry and wet pavement well, perhaps the dignity ended, it's terrible on snow, ice, snowy porridge, in general, the feeling is as if on bald summer tires, there is no controllability at all, I drove 2200 t.km on it, I will change it to a bridge or gislavet. I do not recommend it.

Advantages:

Price, behavior on dry and wet pavement (at different temperatures from +6 to -21), not noisy, I think fuel-efficient.

Flaws:

On snowy porridge it is not controllable at all, just like on snow, and even more so on ice, this is demolition and a huge braking distance and starting only with slippage.

I took 3D for Nivka at the end of 2017, almost before the new year. Before that, there were all-weather mud m / t Goodrich and winter Goodyear Arctic with a spike. I tried both tires in the winter, all-weather tires do not go on ice at all, so-so on snow. The thorn from the buzzer rode for the first 4 years, then it began to tan and somehow it became not fun. Before the new year, I forked out and took back the spike but Nordman 7. The car is coming on ice like a tram on railway tracks. Over the past winter, I forgot what a skid is. rear axle. In the snow I arranged real test drives, if it’s impossible to plant it wisely. There is a tendency to burrow, so you need to turn back in time, do not try to storm the snow that has not been broken from the first arrival.
It rides pretty well in the mud, of course it’s far from the Goodrichs, but you can ride on muddy clay so that the tread doesn’t stick a little more gas. The distance between the tread is large, there is a little self-cleaning.
It rides on the highway no worse than the Goodrichs, it seems to me even quieter. The spike behind the razdatka and the bridge is almost inaudible.

Finnish-made Nokian Nordman 7 tires went on sale in 2017. When designing a new tire model, the main goal of the creators was to provide a comfortable and safe driving. This model winter tires are notable for their high wear resistance and reliable grip in all weather conditions.

Tires Nokian Nordman 7 are in the middle price segment. Despite this, the design of their tread and design characteristics correspond to the same parameters of the more expensive model Hakkapeliitta 7. This ensures perfect tire grip even on particularly difficult road sections. The manufacturer himself positions his new model as the epitome of perfect grip and excellent wear resistance.

Innovative Air Claw technology provides soft contact of the tire with the road and reliability of its interaction with winter surfaces. Shock-absorbing spikes have excellent anti-slip properties. Despite this, they do not create unwanted vibrations that can interfere with the driver. Air Claw technology not only ensures a quiet ride, but also reduces abrasion on the road surface.

Tires Nokian Nordman 7 are notable for having an extended flange. It stays in the tread, thanks to which the spike almost does not sway. For this, the flange is often compared to an anchor.

The extended part of the stud is mounted perpendicular to the direction of movement, and the contact area is increased. Accordingly, the grip at the beginning of the movement and braking is improved. Anchor spikes are excellent during high-speed maneuvering and make this process safer.

Nokian Nordman 7 is made using a special studding technology called Eco Stud System. Previously, it has already been used in other models of the brand. This technology provides complete driving safety due to special holes and pads. Together they securely hold the spikes in the tread.

In the production of products, another technology is used, which is called the "bear claw". Thanks to it, the anti-skid spikes are kept in a vertical plane, the braking distance is reduced, and the wear resistance of the tire is increased.

The reliable use of Nokian Nordman 7 products is guaranteed. Firstly, this model is produced according to successfully implemented and proven technologies that were used in premium segment products. Secondly, these tires have earned a lot of rave reviews from motorists.

I took largus 185.70.14, before that there was a toyo, I put a nordman 7 and the horror of the roar of the howl turns into unpleasant driving, you can’t hear the toyo at all, who the hum and howl doesn’t soar, then take it, drove on the asphalt for 1 thousand, the spikes on place.

DO NOT BUY THIS G...... BUT! Size 185/60/15 Drove 2000 km on it! Hernia (Score on a 5-point scale:

  • Dry road 5 points.
  • Wet road 5 points
  • Wet snow (porridge) 1 point (does not slow down, it is difficult to accelerate).
  • Ice 4 points.

In my opinion, everything seems to be good for such a price ......, but the sides are too soft, the rubber around the spikes is "eaten"). I went to Haka 8, Haka 7, Bridgestone 5000, Bridgestone 7000, Cordiant Snow Cross, there is something to compare.

Better overpay 1000-1500 for a wheel and take hack 8 (you won't regret it)

Advantages:

  • The price is possible, but for how much it is being sold now, it is better to choose another one.
  • The spikes are holding up well.

Flaws:

  • soft and uncontrollable
  • there is no confidence in road grip
  • It’s scary to enter turns, it blows stupidly, the tire’s bead does not hold.

Instead, it is better to take Bridge or something else. Marketing works, but what the bus is about is a fact.

Advantages:

  • only price

I do not recommend! Installed new tires original discs Mercy, and lo and behold! balancing 40-80 grams per wheel, turning 180 degrees does not help, three out of four wheels are curved - you can see it on a tire changer. The noise is catastrophic, at first I thought to buy earplugs. Drove 1500 km, removed, balanced did not help. They refused to exchange.

Advantages:

  • soft
  • drawing

I've been going for a month now. 1000 km run in. no more than 100 km per hour. I looked - all the spikes are in place.

Flaws:

  • as one wrote above or below - weights on one wheel in the amount of 80 grams.

I can't really rate it, there's no snow. It snowed only once, there was porridge, but I could not find out how abs works. on nordman 4 abs worked only like this

Well, the most embarrassing moment. After installing the wheels, the car began to jump at 80 km per hour. Was already once on the tavern ... I think it's a defect or something else. In the near future I will try to reassemble the wheels. It will not help - you have to sell and buy new ones

Advantages:

  • Not noisy

Flaws:

  • Spikes fly out very quickly

I went to Nordman4 - I lost all the spikes, although driving is neat. I bought a Nordman 5, I thought they did something better and ... also after 2 winters there were 30-40 percent of spikes left.

And you think I'll buy a Nordman 7?!

I will never buy this brand again.

That's all I wanted to say...

Neutral Feedback

Eight years old, went to 4. Patency is good, 40% of spikes are left. I change only because of a hernia. All in all, I'm happy. I will take 7.

So, let's begin.

I chose rubber from a couple of three parameters:

  • Stability on wet pavement/snow/slush.
  • To take a hit.
  • Braking.
  • Forgive driver errors or predictable behavior on the road.

I will evaluate on a 10 point scale.

1. 7/10 (Let's go through the points. On the first snow, when we had a "tinker's day", we coped with a bang. Here I still give an account of what kind of driving style and attentiveness.

On wet pavement (icy ice), with sudden braking, it is likely to go into the skid. Therefore, I brake carefully and keep my distance. In general, road holding is acceptable.

On porridge (I haven’t quite felt it yet, but I hope that it won’t let you down at this point either)

  • 2. 8/10 Bumps, unevenness and all sorts of disappointments on our roads.
  • 3. 8/10 Somewhere I saw statistics, these tires took 3rd place in the ranking. The first was Haka 9.
  • 4. 7/10 Like everyone else winter tires- noisy. Not familiar after the summer, at 60+ the hum subsides. At 30-40+, the grinding of jeeps / hum. At 90-110 (I don’t drive anymore in winter, I’m friends with my head) the rumble is acceptable, but you won’t enjoy the trip in summer.
  • 5. 8/10 Like others who unsubscribed here, I also let the car skid, it keeps acceptable, even the system is not on.

Everyone is not a nail or iron, good roads and good luck!

The holder is excellent, not bad on snow and ice. I wrote about the places around the spikes, and so around the spike, pieces of rubber were torn out, but the spikes are all in place, the mileage is already about 5000 km. We watch further. There is practically no noise, as well as bare asphalt.

Advantages:

  • Aquaplaning is above average.
  • Riding on slush is reliable.

Flaws:

  • Braking on dry and wet pavement.
  • exchange rate stability.

I am writing my impressions based on the current temperatures in Moscow time -1 .. +4 Dimension 185/60 R15, front-wheel drive car. I ran it 800-900 km. at that time the rumble was just terrible, now I have traveled 1200 km, it has become a little quieter. As noted earlier, braking on asphalt is disgusting, it’s hard to predict deceleration: with the same pressure on the pedal, it can adequately slow down or go further, so you have to push harder (that’s why I brake on it in advance). From the point of view of handling, the rubber is wadded (like the previous Nokian in different degrees of wadding), that is, a clear zero on the steering wheel is lost with increasing speed, driving faster than 130 km / h is uncomfortable, there is little feedback, the reactions to the steering wheel are lubricated, in turns there is a tendency to demolition. At the start, slippage occurs: rarely on dry asphalt, often on wet asphalt, while it was running in, it slipped very often, although I didn’t press it particularly sharply. From the point of view of strength, it does not raise questions: the spikes are all in place, the lamellas are intact, everything around the spikes is also in place. On water and snow porridge rides fine, if you go straight. Braking and steering response improve quite a bit at -1.. In a sparse settlements, at constant low temperatures, on country roads it will show itself well, the spikes and tread pattern indicate this. And yes, some argue that this rubber is a copy of Hakki 7 - nonsense, Nordman second division Nokian, hence the price and worse properties. I will change mine for first division tires.

Advantages:

  • Rubber soft
  • on wet pavement keeps confidently in his element.
  • When cornering behaves confidently.
  • After 1000 km. while the pins are in place.

On dry pavement, poor braking. With a sharp start, it slips on asphalt, although I don’t drown much. On ice, controllability is not clear, sometimes it is scary, I compare it with CORDIANT sno max. Incomprehensible rubber micro-ruptures around the spikes after running in, ran in 500 km in a gentle pensioner's driving style. It is not known how long this rubber will last, namely the spikes and tread pattern. Let's see what will happen next.

Advantages:

  • Low fuel consumption, just like summer tires.

Flaws:

  • Pulls out pieces of rubber near the spike on the drive axle.
  • With a run of 1000 km, the balancing of 15-25 grams on all 4 wheels went away (initially, the balancing was to zero), how many new wheels I took before that never happened.
  • They make a lot of noise.

I'm afraid for the spikes, they don't inspire confidence. The start is as smooth as possible, with a lot of throttle. Before that, there was a Gislaved Nord Frost 100, so it left the traffic light with axle box (it steered on asphalt better than Nordman), didn’t bathe with running in at all and not a single spike flew out, the rubber around the spike didn’t crumble. I bet that in the winter the Nordman will win back over the ice and over the snowdrifts. Otherwise it's really sad :(

Auto Lada Largus tires 185/65 r 15 drove 600 miles. First impressions are very positive. Tried on different pressure 2, 2 atm and 2, 4 atm the difference is felt strongly at 2, 2 is much softer. I’m buying Nordman for the second time, I don’t remember the first number I rolled on the Skoda A5 after I pulled it off on the Michelin and the wheel broke right away I put (in an hour) Nordman so heaven and earth. I also rolled a hackapellita, probably the first one on the VAZ 2106, I drove with my eyes closed-))) In general, something like this.

Advantages:

  • Quiet, I have something to compare,
  • gas mileage as in summer
  • handling is good, soft in general, I have not yet found any shortcomings.

Flaws:

  • Yes, there are none, we will look at the spikes at the end of the season and try it in the snow, but for now everything is fine.
koreada.ru - About cars - Information portal